Task Problem of Laraudogoitia's (See Mathematics Recreation link)

This is a class of problems that have kept philosophers busy for some time.

Paul Benacerraf is right to say that the state of the problem before t=1 (i.e. 0
One of the questions is why is there so much confusion about this. The answer is that mathematicians regularly compute the limits of sequence and series. This is the simplest form of a supertask. Indeed, Eudoxus' solution of Zeno's paradox was to show that there was a limit in the case of the arrow problem.

It is natural to accept Eudoxus' conclusion because we can see the arrow strike the target with our own eyes. On the other hand we can not see Laraudogoitia's problem played out because it deals with point masses that do not exist and can not exist.

In general the problem is that this conundrum is not well posed. The axioms that determine the outcome of the problem are not stated, but they are implied. If we take the problem to be a problem of mathematics, then the answer is that no ball reaches x=0. The real trick is that by introducing time into the problem we introduce a red herring. If we ignore time and set the problem up as a series of balls at x=1,x=2,x=3, and send a ball with speed 1 from x=0 toward the ball at x=1, we will see an infinite series of collisions none of which are outside the real line.

In the case of Laraudogoitia's conundrum, the balls are struck one after the other but the collisions never reach the end point which we could just as well have chosen to be at infinity instead of at x=0.