Mission Statement

The purpose of this blog is to celebrate all things mathematical.
Solutions to the mathematical recreation problems posed at

Mathematics Recreation

will eventually appear here. Wait for the solution corresponding to a given problem to appear before commenting on it.
You may also give your solution in the comment section here.


About Me

My photo
My pen name (pronounced dow-groots) is an anagram of a famous mathematician and popularizer of paradoxes.

Monday, January 24, 2011

Simple Railroad Car problem





Consider the simple railroad car problem

Two trains headed by engines wish to pass each other so that the trains are in the same order after reassembly. There is one siding which will hold one car at a time. The engines may disconnect and go into the siding or they may push a car into the siding but only from the right side of the diagram.

This is similar to a sliding block puzzle except that that certain blocks or cars can only move if attached to the engines.

Give a solution to the problem. Is your solution the best (shortest number of moves) possible where a move is a position where a car has been put into the siding or removed from the siding.

A partial form of a solution is given below.



Friday, January 21, 2011

Task Problem of Laraudogoitia's (See Mathematics Recreation link)

This is a class of problems that have kept philosophers busy for some time.

Paul Benacerraf is right to say that the state of the problem before t=1 (i.e. 0
One of the questions is why is there so much confusion about this. The answer is that mathematicians regularly compute the limits of sequence and series. This is the simplest form of a supertask. Indeed, Eudoxus' solution of Zeno's paradox was to show that there was a limit in the case of the arrow problem.

It is natural to accept Eudoxus' conclusion because we can see the arrow strike the target with our own eyes. On the other hand we can not see Laraudogoitia's problem played out because it deals with point masses that do not exist and can not exist.

In general the problem is that this conundrum is not well posed. The axioms that determine the outcome of the problem are not stated, but they are implied. If we take the problem to be a problem of mathematics, then the answer is that no ball reaches x=0. The real trick is that by introducing time into the problem we introduce a red herring. If we ignore time and set the problem up as a series of balls at x=1,x=2,x=3, and send a ball with speed 1 from x=0 toward the ball at x=1, we will see an infinite series of collisions none of which are outside the real line.

In the case of Laraudogoitia's conundrum, the balls are struck one after the other but the collisions never reach the end point which we could just as well have chosen to be at infinity instead of at x=0.